Cardiac ryanodine receptor calcium release deficiency syndrome.

Cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2) gain-of-function mutations cause catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, a condition characterized by prominent ventricular ectopy in response to catecholamine stress, which can be reproduced on exercise stress testing (EST). However, reports of sudden cardiac death (SCD) have emerged in EST-negative individuals who have loss-of-function (LOF) RyR2 mutations. The clinical relevance of RyR2 LOF mutations including their pathogenic mechanism, diagnosis, and treatment are all unknowns. Here, we performed clinical and genetic evaluations of individuals who suffered from SCD and harbored an LOF RyR2 mutation. We carried out electrophysiological studies using a programed electrical stimulation protocol consisting of a long-burst, long-pause, and short-coupled (LBLPS) ventricular extra-stimulus. Linkage analysis of RyR2 LOF mutations in six families revealed a combined logarithm of the odds ratio for linkage score of 11.479 for a condition associated with SCD with negative EST. A RyR2 LOF mouse model exhibited no catecholamine-provoked ventricular arrhythmias as in humans but did have substantial cardiac electrophysiological remodeling and an increased propensity for early afterdepolarizations. The LBLPS pacing protocol reliably induced ventricular arrhythmias in mice and humans having RyR2 LOF mutations, whose phenotype is otherwise concealed before SCD. Furthermore, treatment with quinidine and flecainide abolished LBLPS-induced ventricular arrhythmias in model mice. Thus, RyR2 LOF mutations underlie a previously unknown disease entity characterized by SCD with normal EST that we have termed RyR2 Ca2+ release deficiency syndrome (CRDS). Our study provides insights into the mechanism of CRDS, reports a specific CRDS diagnostic test, and identifies potentially efficacious anti-CRDS therapies.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy and device-related complications in young patients with inherited cardiomyopathies or channelopathies: a 17-year cohort study.

Aims: To quantify appropriate and inappropriate therapy and complications related to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) treatment in young patients receiving an ICD for a hereditary cardiomyopathy or channelopathy. Methods and results: This was a retrospective study including 117 consecutive patients who had received an ICD at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark from 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2015. Patients were followed from the date of ICD implantation until migration, death, heart transplantation, or end of follow-up on 1 February 2017. Mean age at implantation was 30.5 ± 12.8 years, and the patients were followed for a mean period of 7.1 ± 4.4 years. The cumulative incidence at 1, 5, and 10 years was 17%, 29%, and 48% for appropriate ICD therapy, 6%, 13%, and 20% for inappropriate ICD therapy, and 7%, 18%, and 33% for device-related complications, respectively. Patients with an ICD implanted for secondary prevention had a higher risk of appropriate therapy compared with patients implanted for primary prevention [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 5.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.22-12.09; P < 0.01]. There was no difference in the risk of inappropriate therapy (adjusted HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.55-4.56; P = 0.40) or device-related complications (adjusted HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.56-2.68; P = 0.62) between patients with primary and secondary preventive indication. Conclusion: We observed high absolute risk estimates for appropriate ICD therapy in young patients with an ICD indicated by a hereditary cardiomyopathy or channelopathy. Also risks for inappropriate ICD therapy and device-related complications were significant.

Multifocal atrial and ventricular premature contractions with an increased risk of dilated cardiomyopathy caused by a Nav1.5 gain-of-function mutation (G213D).

BACKGROUND: SCN5A mutations can lead to different cardiac diseases. Recently, SCN5A mutations have been linked to the clinical entity multifocal ectopic Purkinje-related premature contractions (MEPPC) characterized by ventricular ectopy and dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS & RESULTS: A family with a uniform MEPPC-like phenotype, associated with complex atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and dilated cardiomyopathy caused by a high frequency of ventricular ectopy was clinically assessed. Screening of the SCN5A gene revealed a missense mutation in the linker between segments 3 and 4 in domain 1 of the Nav1.5 protein, resulting in a glycine to aspartate substitution at position 213 (G213D). The phenotype co-segregated with the missense mutation. Electrophysiological studies of wild type (WT) hNav1.5 and hNav1.5_G213D expressed in CHO-K cells showed that the voltage of half-maximal activation (V½) was significantly more negative for hNav1.5_G213D compared to WT (V½=-38.7±0.5mV for WT and V½=-42.4±0.5mV for G213D; P<0.001). This suggests activation of Nav1.5_G231D at more negative potentials. The V½ of steady-state inactivation was significantly shifted towards more positive values for Nav1.5_G213D (V½=-86.7±0.2mV for WT and -82.2±0.3mV for G213D; P<0.001), also contributing to a gain-of-function phenotype. Flecainide and amiodarone markedly reduced premature atrial and ventricular contractions in four patients. CONCLUSION: The Nav1.5_G213D mutation is associated with a gain-of-function phenotype, multifocal atrial and ventricular ectopy and dilated cardiomyopathy. Since patients with a MEPPC-like phenotype may specifically benefit from Class-1 antiarrhythmic drugs or amiodarone, clinical identification of this disease entity is important.

Outcome of clinical management in relatives of sudden cardiac death victims.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend clinical assessment of the surviving first-degree relatives of sudden cardiac death (SCD) victims to identify a probable cause of death and protect surviving relatives. Only few studies have reported the outcome of clinical management and follow-up of relatives to SCD victims. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of the clinical and genetic assessment of surviving relatives of SCD victims referred to the Clinic of Inherited Cardiac Diseases at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, between 1995 and 2016. We studied clinical and autopsy findings on all cases of SCD among children and adults. Relatives were followed for adverse cardiovascular events including cardiac hospitalization, new-onset heart failure, coronary heart disease, malignant syncope or documented malignant ventricular arrhythmias, and death. RESULTS: We included 292 relatives of 56 SCD victims. During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 3.3 (1.6-4.7) years twelve relatives experienced an adverse cardiovascular event of which only five were related to the inherited cardiac disease in the family. One developed dilated cardiomyopathy and one tachycardia induced heart failure, five suffered from ventricular tachycardia or a malignant syncope and received a secondary prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator, three had a coronary heart disease event and two died from old age. CONCLUSION: Relatives of SCD victims have a low rate of adverse cardiac events when guideline-based assessment and care is applied.